This paper on Improving International Development Evaluation through Geospatial Data and Analysis (authors: Malte Lech, Juha Uitto, Sven Harten, Geeta Batra and Anupam Anand) was just published in the International Journal of Geospatial and Environmental Research.
Monday, October 29, 2018
Tuesday, September 18, 2018
Ordos: Not quite a ghost town
Ordos, in the Chinese autonomous region of Inner Mongolia,
has been called a ‘ghost town’ (see for example Wade Shepard’s 2017 article in Forbes magazine, entitled “China’s Most
Infamous ‘Ghost City’ Is Rising from the Desert”). There’s a reason for that;
the city is not exactly packed with life. Still the depiction may be unfair. I
spent a week there last autumn and found the place to be both intriguing and
challenging. It surely is impressive, with its high rises, wide avenues,
monumental squares and parks. When I landed at the shiny new airport in the
middle of the night, disembarking from an Air China flight from Beijing, the
entry was very smooth. There were few people at the airport and a taxi was
waiting. We headed off on a road to near total darkness soon to arrive at a
brightly lit toll gate with extravagant decorations shining in the night. Then
off we went on a drive that felt like an eternity on an empty eight-lane
highway, mostly unlit, until we hit the outskirts of the city. I was sharing
the ride with an American lady whom we dropped off first at a massive Howard
Johnson establishment (I didn’t know these motels came in such sizes) before
driving another 5 minutes to reach my hotel, Tieniu, across a large
intersection in the middle of the city. In the lobby I was met by a young man
dressed in a pale blue uniform explaining the system to me: where the
restaurants were, at what time meals were served, etc.; and taking me to my 9th
floor room. The room was comfortable, overlooking the intersection and a park
behind it, and after a while I settled into the standard hotel bed.
Dongsheng dawn |
The morning dawned beautiful. After only a few hours of
sleep I woke up and looked out over the intersection and the park. The moon
shone over the slowly brightening sky. It was quiet and no movement could be
seen. Around 7 am the city started to wake up and loud music with a disco beat
started blaring from the park. Presumably it was played to prepare the city’s
denizens for another productive day; most likely there were people in the park
engaging in rhythmic morning exercises but I couldn’t see it from my room.
The young man in blue from last night, I would find out,
belonged to a group of hundreds of student volunteers who had been mobilized to
guide the thousands of foreigners who had gathered in town for the 13th
meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP13) of the United Nations
Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD). Ordos was hosting the biannual
event in its large new Convention Center, apparently one of the first such
international gatherings in town. The student guides were an essential part of
the success, as the locals certainly were not well equipped to deal with the
invasion. While street signs were generally in three scripts – Chinese,
Mongolian and Western – they would not be very helpful. Similarly, the ability
of the local people to communicate in English was virtually non-existent. Even
at the reception of this 4-star hotel, the staff lacked even a rudimentary
knowledge of basic English words.
I walked out of the hotel and turned left on what appeared
to be a commercial street. The air was dry
Dongsheng |
I returned to the hotel and asked the group of volunteers in
their pale blue outfits about how to get to the Convention Center. A helpful
young lady explained that there was a bus that would go straight there and that
I wouldn’t have to pay the fare. Apparently, there was a deal that the foreign
delegates would ride free; having us understand the payment system and give the
right amount of money was clearly more trouble than it was worth. I would just
have to walk across the street and wait for bus number 3. Crossing the road was
no problem as there was virtually no traffic, so I positioned myself on the bus
stop and started to wait.
There were a couple of other people who ogled me with
curiosity. Soon two teenage girls approached me. One of them ventured a
hesitant ‘hello’ and plenty of giggles followed when I responded in the same
way. That was the extent of our mutual vocabulary, but the girls indicated that
they wanted to have photographs with me. We asked the other people waiting at
the bus stop to take the photos.
Soon bus number 3 arrived and I boarded it. The driver
welcomed me with a smile. There was one other passenger, a middle-aged lady who
was equally welcoming and said something to me in Chinese. This turned out to
be a regular city bus. I placed myself next to an open window, as the day was
getting warm and I could welcome the breeze. The bus moved at an
extraordinarily slow pace through the vast deserted streets. At a later stop, a
young man in the pale blue uniform boarded and the friendly lady beckoned him
over. The volunteer confirmed that I was on the right bus and that I should
just have to wait until we reached the Convention Center stop; I would not be
able to miss it. Soon the bus left the city and entered an eight-lane highway,
presumably the same my taxi had used last night. The highway was new and looked
very impressive. There was very little traffic. Some cars cruised smoothly past
us, while we encountered a few other buses and trucks. The landscape around us,
now that I could see it, was open and the blue sky appeared high. Everywhere
there were tree plantations with saplings in straight rows sticking out of the
dry soil. The landforms were rolling hills. Afforesting the bare hills was
obviously an official priority. There was a river and a reservoir with large
Chinese letters in bright red inscribed on the adjacent hillside. Perhaps they
declared some environmental goal but I could not be certain. The bus crept
along the fancy highway at most 50 km/h. The speed limit said 100 km/h, or 80
in areas of intersections. When the road moved uphill, our speed slowed to a
crawl. I was concerned that the engine would die and we would be deserted in
the middle of an empty stretch with the scorching sun upon us in the merciless
sky.
Reservoir between Dongsheng and Kangbashi |
The highway passed through empty areas with only neat
afforestation projects on both sides. In some places they were irrigated by
water trucks. There were old workers in neon vests ambling around the center
plantations that separated the traffic going in opposite directions.
Occasionally we would see high rise developments that looked empty. Finally, we
left the highway and entered another urban area: the Kangbashi New District.
The city roads were wide with three lanes going in each direction. On the
roadsides there were monuments of large horses – this was Inner Mongolia where
horses have played a central part in the culture since the times of the Genghis
Khan – and parks with fountains sparing no amount of water in this dry land. We
reached the Convention Center stop and I disembarked. The bus ride had taken 70
minutes. I had enjoyed the scenery and the few people on the bus, including the
driver, had been very hospitable but I decided I would invest in a taxi ride
from now on for the coming week. This would cut the travel time by half.
Convention Center in Kangbashi |
The Convention Center occupied large grounds and was very
pleasant. The first thing a visitor saw was a display of plant art, dominated
by a 7-8 meter tall horse flanked by other Mongolian items. There was a booth
selling coffee and cold drinks, as well as other utility booths, before one
entered the main building. On the left there was a massive tent that served as
the dining area where one could purchase a large variety of Chinese, Western,
vegetarian and halal foods (there are lots of Muslims in northwestern China). I
spent the rest of the day – and several more to come – in the conference. We
also conducted a field visit to environmental projects funded, amongst others,
by the Global Environment Facility. But the evenings I would spend in
Dongsheng, mostly by myself as my colleagues were all lodged in Kangbashi.
By now I had figured out how these two centers hang together
(and here I rely in particular on an article by the geographer Max Woodworth
published in the journal Cities in
2015). Located in the valley of the Yellow River, Ordos has historically been a
poor area in China, plagued by its dry climate (with an average annual rainfall
of only 341 mm) and poor agricultural land. In the early-2000s, however, the
town experienced a significant boom period due to exploitation of its abundant
natural resources – notably coal and gas, which also experienced high prices at
that period. As a consequence, Ordos was dubbed as “China’s new coal capital”: investment poured in and people’s incomes rose rapidly. Dongsheng was the
town that had previously formed the urban core of Ordos. In 2001, Ordos
Municipality was founded around Dongsheng and a new center, the Kangbashi New
District, was established about 25 km north of Dongsheng to form this bi-centered
conglomerate. The two centers and other subcenters in between were connected by
the fancy new highways that I had now traveled on. Kangbashi was a planned center with
administrative offices, cultural facilities and residential areas – and the
Convention Center – popping up at a rapid succession. Kangbashi New District
was inaugurated in 2006. Apart from the fine new infrastructure, there was a
major greening effort that included planting 200,000 trees – I had observed
this on my first trip from Dongsheng to Kangbashi.
The Ordos Performing Arts Center & Ordos Cultural Center |
In the decade from 2000 to 2010, the Ordos municipality’s
population increased by 39% as some
Dongsheng by night |
At nighttime, all public buildings and monuments in both
Kangbashi and Dongsheng were brightly lit with colorful lights that shifted and
flashed forming impressive displays of lightshows. All of the electricity would
be provided by coalfired power plants implanted in the surrounding desert. From
my hotel room I could see a fountain sprouting water high up in the air in
different formations illuminated with spotlights constantly changing colors.
The high rise next door had an entire wall decorated with red and blue lights
in the pattern of flowing water. Every few minutes a car would pass on the
avenues below.
When I had some free time on a Sunday, I walked over to the
park. At its center was an artificial lake
The park in Dongsheng |
One of the first evenings I returned to the hotel hungry and
wanted to have dinner. It was about 8:45 pm and I had been informed that the
restaurant would be open until 9:30. My arrival caused considerable commotion.
The maître d’, an attractive woman in a black uniform with a short skirt and
black stockings, literally ran to the dining room and found that all other
patrons (if indeed there had been any) had already departed and the staff were
busy closing shop. Luckily there would be room service available. With the help
of the nice lady I was able to select a meal to be brought to my room. She
didn’t speak any English but there was an English menu and I picked a familiar
item: Kung Pao Chicken. She also took me to a room that served as their wine
cellar where I selected a bottle of local Great Wall red wine (not bad at all).
About 20 minutes later the same maître d’ showed up at my door with a waiter
carrying the food and wine.
Ms. Zhang |
On another night I repeated the procedure, went to the 2nd
floor restaurant reception, negotiated with the lovely maître d’ (by this time
I had learned that her name was Zhang) and ordered room service. Mongolian food
tends to be heavy on meat and this time my meal was diced beef with onions,
leeks and asparagus. It probably was the best meal I had in Ordos. Zhang and a
waiter again brought it up to my room. This time she stayed behind for a few minutes
and we took selfies with each other. She also showed me some photos on her cell
phone.
The selfie theme repeated itself several times during my
visit, so rare was the appearance of foreign creatures in these parts. Once
when I was returning to Dongsheng from the conference, the taxi driver, a
middle-aged man, stopped the taxi, whipped out his cell phone and asked whether
he could snap a selfie with me in the back seat. Of course, I had no
objections.
One evening as I returned to the hotel I was determined to
find somewhere else with a bit of life to sit and enjoy the scenery. I
descended to the reception where there were five or six employees behind the
counter. I tried to ask about where I could go out for a drink. This drew a
blank. Not a single one of the employees understood the word. No worries, soon
a young woman in pale blue ran to my rescue. Unfortunately, she was equally
lost. I suggested a ‘bar’, but neither was that word familiar to her. But she
did have an electronic dictionary and after consulting it for a while, she
looked up to me and asked: “So you want to go to a pub?” I said that a pub was
close enough and that I would indeed want to go to one. She consulted with the
receptionists who still looked lost. I suggested that hotels usually had bars, especially
big ones like the Tieniu, but learned that this was not the case in Ordos. We
went outside and consulted with two taxi drivers and came to the conclusion
that a pub did indeed exist in Dongsheng. So I jumped into the back of the taxi
and off we drove into the darkness. I was having second thoughts as the taxi
drove through empty avenues further and further away from what I had thought
was city center. We passed another smaller hotel in front of which we had to
wait as a bus let off a large group of Chinese tourists. We drove across a
parking lot and turned onto a street that appeared entirely dark. Lo and
behold, the taxi driver curved in front of a building where there indeed was a
pub. Hospitable as everyone I had met in Ordos was, the taxi driver got out of
the car, walked with me to the establishment and announced my arrival to the
staff. I was warmly welcomed as the smiling taxi driver bowed deep and
retreated backwards towards his waiting vehicle on the dark deserted street.
The pub |
I was ushered to a table. The place had a red theme, wooden
tables, and a prominent bar in the middle of the room. There were only two
other customers in the establishment, a youngish Western couple chatting over
beers at a nearby table. The staff consisted of a man and a woman who served as
waiters and another woman on the kitchen side who appeared to be the boss. The
man brought me a menu, which had some English and a few pictures. I saw there
were a few foreign beers, like Allagash White, but when the waiter suggested
the first item on the menu I gladly agreed. Soon I had in front of me a 1.5-liter
pitcher of local beer, which would put me back by about $1. I also ordered an
item from the menu having first ascertained that it was chicken (I ended up
shaking my folded arms as if they were the short wings of a hen and, as that
didn’t do the trick, drew a chicken on a napkin; by this time the boss had also
emerged from the kitchen and she nodded vigorously in affirmation).
The evening turned very pleasant. Little by little, after 9
pm local kids started to drift into the bar. They all looked relaxed and
dressed in jeans or miniskirts in a slightly punkish style. Some carried guitar
cases. They ordered beer and chatted. My chicken and beer did the trick and I
felt contended. On TV there was a Chinese historical fantasy drama where drop-dead-gorgeous women slashed bad guys with swords. The foreign couple got up and went
to the cashier to pay, only to find that their credit cards would not be
accepted and they did not have any cash. The boss emerged again from the
kitchen and a negotiation ensued. With sign language, the foreigners explained
that they lived in a nearby hotel and showed the hotel card. They promised to
come back the following day to pay, which I am convinced they would do (they
looked very decent). Luckily, I had found a Bank of China branch where I had
been able to withdraw cash for the taxi rides and other minor investments, so I
had no trouble paying the bill. The nice young lady who was the boss called me
a taxi and the male waiter escorted me to the dark empty street when it
arrived.
On the following evening after work I returned to the
shopping mall next to my hotel. I found the shop where I had tried to purchase
drinks on my first day. The same woman was behind the counter and her face lit
up when she saw me. She welcomed me warmly like an old friend and quickly ran
to fetch the bottles of local liquor I had failed to purchase the first time
around. This time I had cash and we separated thanking each other profusely.
Then in the basement where the food stores were located, I found a small café
that sold beer. It was weak and warm but wet and it made my day.
Ordos Municipality Government offices, Kangbashi New District |
On my last afternoon with all work completed I left the
Convention Center in Kangbashi and walked maybe 15 minutes alongside the broad
and empty avenues towards Ordos Museum. I passed the Kangbashi police
headquarters, a big square building flanked by a red flag behind a bank of
colorful flowers. Then the Kangbashi New District municipal offices that were
housed in four large blocks with a Genghis Khan themed monument in front.
I crossed the avenue, which was not challenging despite its
impressive width because of the sparse
traffic, and entered a vast park – the
Genghis Khan Square. The space was wide open and the trees that were there had
been planted only recently. The entrance to the park sported a statue of two
huge horses standing on their hindlegs. Further in, there were equally large
and fanciful statues, including a pair of gigantic Mongolian
wrestlers positioned against each other across a square. All of these were
very creative and entertaining. I spotted another person in the park, a Chinese
man taking photographs of the features.
The park was surrounded by some of the most important
buildings in Kangbashi, including the Ordos Performing Arts Center, the Ordos
Cultural Center, the Ordos Library and the Ordos Museum. They all had very
innovative contemporary architecture. I took a direction diagonally across the
park towards the museum, passing a very nice and imaginative patch of flowers
with larger than life sheep grazing in the middle.
Ordos Museum |
The museum itself was definitely worth a visit. The massive
building had an impressive contemporary design like a huge egg laid on a high foundation. It was designed by the Chinese architects MAD and opened in 2011. I walked around it in
the relentless afternoon sunshine searching for the main entrance (it turned
out that I started circling the edifice in the wrong direction and had to walk
around almost all of it to land at the main doors). The moment I arrived, I was
greeted by a young lady in the same pale blue uniform as those at my hotel, at
the conference site and even on the bus. From now on, I would be passed on from
one hostess to the next in a relay that would show me everything in the museum.
We started on the first floor with some contemporary art by local artists. Very
good, I thought. We then proceeded through prehistoric rooms with life-sized
woolly mammoths and dioramas of primitive people engaged in daily chores
accompanied by archeological finds, advancing through the history of Inner
Mongolia all the way to the Communist revolution (again dioramas, this time with
Red Guards guiding the local people), to collections of porcelain (that
disappointingly were not from the region but were on loan from some coastal
museum). At each floor, the current guide handed me over to a next one. All of
them were university students with an English major who had been brought here
for the duration of the conference. All were knowledgeable and very kind, but I
particularly liked one – a student from Hohhot University not far from Ordos –
who had a twinkle in her eye and dropped some subtle, yet very funny remarks
regarding the exhibits.
Museum insides |
I was genuinely impressed by the museum. Not only were the
exhibits very interesting and well done, but the architecture of the building
was beautiful. On the inside, sunlight pouring through strategically located
windows of different shapes created stunning patterns of light and shadows. I
asked the last of the ladies to allow me to wander around for a while by
myself. I took the stairs down from the top floor back to the entrance admiring
the architecture. On the ground floor, I was greeted by all the ladies who had
escorted me and led to the museum store. We also took some photographs with
ourselves.
The volunteers in the museum |
On my last morning, I got up at 5:30 and had a breakfast of
fried rice with egg, vegetables, steamed dumplings, tea and juice. Having
finished packing, I took a taxi to the airport. The trip through mostly empty
highways took some 45 minutes. The airport is truly beautiful but it, too, was
virtually empty. I was the only passenger at that early hour checking into the
Air China flight to Beijing. At the check-in counter, I was greeted by one of
the pale blue volunteers who helped me to get my boarding pass and directed me
to the beautiful lounge where a hostess in a silk uniform with a miniskirt
welcomed me. I again was the only customer, until three Chinese fellow
travelers entered and ended my peaceful reverie.
I felt surprisingly melancholy about leaving this place.
Saturday, August 25, 2018
Back in Mizusawa
Yoko and Nowa in the old part of Mizusawa |
July and we’re back in Mizusawa, as regularly as
migrating birds, every summer for many years already. This is Yoko’s hometown
and I’ve grown to feel it’s mine as well. Nowa has spent most of her summers and some New Year's vacations there too.
I’ve also watched it change, both
economically, socially and geographically. Mizusawa has some history, although
it’s short by Japanese standards where history is measured in centuries and
millennia: the town was founded in 1889 and made formally into a city in 1954.
But by now, Mizusawa is no longer a city in its own right. In 2006 it
was merged with the neighboring communities of Esashi, Maesawa, Isawa and
Koromogawa to form the new city of Oshu. The former cities (shi) were downgraded to the status of
wards (ku) in the newly formed
Oshu-shi. It probably made sense in some administrative manner. Life in
Mizusawa didn’t change noticeably and the old Mizusawa city hall close to our
house was turned into Oshu city hall.
Our house |
We are in Iwate prefecture (ken) in the middle of the Tohoku region in the northern part of the
main Japanese island of Honshu. Oshu-shi is almost 500 km straight north from
Tokyo. It is located in a north-south valley, with the tall mountains of Akita-ken rising to the west. A coastal mountain range separates the area from
the Sanriku coast further to the east. This is very lucky as the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami of March 11th, 2011, that destroyed many of the coastal towns, such as Rikuzentakata, Ofunato, Kamaishi and Kesennuma,
killed more than 15,000 people, and caused the Fukushima nuclear meltdown,
hardly affected Mizusawa’s surroundings. Sure, the massive shakes were felt
here strong enough and electricity was cut off for two weeks in parts of the town, but that was the
extent of the damage.
Mizusawa was a small town, at least by Japanese
standards. It used to have a bit over 60,000 inhabitants when it was put together with its neighbors. It is a center of an agricultural area with expansive
tracts of rice paddies, apple orchards and vegetable gardens. Consequently,
many of the inhabitants are rural types and the age structure rather old.
Although Iwate (like Akita) has plenty of hot springs, the main resort areas –
like the famous Hanamaki Onsen – are further north from Mizusawa, in the mountains. Mizusawa
did have some things going for it, though, that made it different from some of
the other small rural towns. It was an administrative center for the region and
it had a big hospital.
Small rivers and canals run through the old part of town. Some houses along them are old and somewhat dilapidated but new ones are appearing here and there. The waterways are generally clean and there are fish and crayfish in the main channel. Some beautiful gardens line the creeks.
Rural outskirts |
Urban canals |
Interestingly, the town is also host to one of the six International Latitude Observatories, which has for decades brought visiting scholars and scientists to the town from all over the world. All these observatories – in California, Ohio, Maryland, Italy, Turkmenistan and Mizusawa – are located near the 39o08’ parallel to measure the Earth’s wobble. You can still go for days without seeing another foreigner, but at least people are quite used to seeing my kind of big blond gaijin in town. This summer, there are three American kids enrolled in the Mizusawa elementary school.
The shinkansen station |
Oshu-shi lies about halfway between the two largest
cities in Tohoku: Sendai (pop. 1.1 million) to the south and Morioka (pop.
297,000) to the north. The main Tohoku shinkansen
bullet train track goes through Oshu-shi and makes a stop at the
Mizusawa-Esashi station. Some people are surprised that the shinkansen makes a
stop at the juncture of these relatively small towns, but there is a logical explanation: Ichiro Ozawa (b. 1942). The perennial opposition leader and powerful politician
actually hails from Mizusawa and remains quite popular in these parts. Even we
received a congratulatory message from him when we got married at the Komagata
shrine here in town (this didn’t please my mother-in-law who was a regional
planner in the prefectural government and no fan of Ozawa’s). In a type example
of politics of patronage, Mizusawa received a shinkansen stop.
A ceremony at Komagata shrine |
There’s a twist to the story, however – a twist that explains some of the later developments in the urban geography of the area. Mizusawa is also on the regular north-south railway line on which the local trains to Morioka and smaller towns in Iwate travel. Naturally, the original plan was to build the Tohoku shinkansen line so that it would take the same route and the bullet trains would stop at around the existing Mizusawa station. The station area at that time was the heart of the city, with a thriving main street containing many shops and restaurants and a couple of hotels. Apparently the chamber of commerce feared that a shinkansen station would disturb their idyll and voted against it. Instead, the shinkansen would stop some kilometers further east, in a relatively unpopulated area between the cities of Mizusawa and Esashi.
How wrong could they have been? What happened was that
the area around the new shinkansen station started to develop, as many people
preferred to live close to the transportation hub that would take them to
Morioka, Sendai and all the way to Tokyo. The area around Mizusawa station
declined and shops started closing.
Universe -- A new shopping center |
In a parallel development, Mizusawa became much more
car-oriented. The old center with its narrow streets was made for walking and
biking. Now shopping centers with expansive parking lots were developed on the
outskirts of the town. The outer roads turned into strip malls with car
dealerships, pachinko parlors with slot machines, chain restaurants and other
establishments. The best hotel in town is no longer the Mizusawa Grand on the
main station street (where our wedding reception was held) but the MizusawaPlaza Inn to the east from the local train tracks. Full disclosure: Plaza Inn
is owned and operated by one of Yoko's best friends, Mami Kikuchi; the girls went to
junior high school together. The hotel is very popular as a wedding location
and boasts two excellent restaurants: a traditional Japanese restaurant
Kikusui; and the Western Quattre Saisons. (Typically of the modesty of the
Japanese people, the successful businesswoman Mami who in addition owns other
restaurants in Iwate still drives a tiny Suzuki Lapin.)
With Mami and her Lapin |
As in so many Japanese towns, there is a fancy multipurpose cultural center in Oshu-shi as well. The Z Hall that contains a large concert hall and hosts a variety of events (and where my brother-in-law Jun works) was also built to the east of the tracks towards Esashi.
There was a time a decade or so ago when it was rather
depressing to walk along the main street by the station, as so many of the
shops were closed down and very few people would be on the street. A large
number of small bars were still operating in the narrow small streets north of
the main drag but the evenings tended to feel rather lonely, while younger
people drove to the family restaurants in the shopping centers and strip malls.
Even the classic Takatoyo fish mongers moved further out.
Jun sings at Urara while Akira tends bar |
Then something seems to have happened again and the
area no longer feels dead. New shops and cafés have opened around the station,
as have big and shiny karaoke joints to compete with the rustic Urara, a
karaoke bar run by Yoko and Jun’s aunt Eiko and her husband Akira. One reason
may be the development of new housing and opening of a shopping center,
Universe, not far from the old center a stone’s throw from our house. The son
of the owner of a classic coffee shop, Rengaya, a couple of years ago opened a
stylish yet cozy café called Jazzrise, which boasts a great collection of jazz
vinyls. It has to be said, though, that the collection is no match to that in
Ray Brown, a jazz bar just a couple of blocks away from our house, which Yoko’s
uncle Toshikatsu, a keen jazz man, introduced me to.
The old station area has recovered somewhat |
Rural Japan is facing a serious problem of
depopulation and aging, with planners and researchers talking about ‘ghost
towns’ (my friend Brendan Barrett, a professor at Osaka University is one who
has written about the unfortunate phenomenon). Apart from the obvious social
problems and the declining services in rural areas, this has also serious
environmental consequences as old managed agricultural landscapes disintegrate
into abandonment. Somewhat counterintuitively, this even threatens biodiversity
as the rice-based agricultural and water management systems developed here over
millennia – known as satoyama – maintain
a rich and delicate balance between natural and human systems.
The main river has clean water, fish and crayfish |
The water is clean and abundant, the locally
produced food superior, and the climate pleasant (especially this summer when
many places in Japan have broken heat records and dozens of people have died as
a consequence – the new normal with climate change, I’m afraid – the somewhat
cooler and less moist air of Tohoku is a blessing).
Mizusawa still may not be a thrilling center of
excitement, but it is a good place to be. And it feels like home.
Tambo (rice paddy) art on the city edge |
Tuesday, August 14, 2018
Tips for young and emerging evaluators
This blog was originally posted at www.zendaofir.com.
Unprecedented wildfires, deadly heatwaves, extraordinary floods, storms and droughts from California to Sweden, from Greece to Japan. The northern summer of 2018 has given us a preview of what the greenhouse world will look like, as countries and governments have become increasingly divided and inward looking, struggling to find solutions to sustainable development. Scientists are now more confident than ever linking the likelihood of extreme weather events to global climate change. Already now, climate change affects all spheres of human endeavor, including economics, health, population movement, food security, and politics. It will have huge implications on development around the world and, especially, on the most vulnerable people.
Evaluation can play a major role in analyzing policies, strategies, programs and projects in light of what works, under what circumstances, and how our actions can lead to positive changes for the people and the planet. It is up to the next generation of young and emerging evaluators to rise to this challenge.
Top Tip 1. Think beyond individual interventions and their objectives. For evaluation to remain relevant, the profession must broaden its horizons beyond checking whether individual interventions are doing what they were set out to do. It must verify whether the interventions are having an impact on the problem they are addressing and whether the impact is lasting. Evaluation is not just about monitoring and indicators, nor is it about performance audit. It is about understanding and explanation of how change happens and how we can more effectively enhance positive change and minimize negative consequences.
Top Tip 2. Understand, deal with and assess choices and trade-offs made or that should have been made. What we know clearly from experiences at the Global Environment Facility (GEF) is that all interventions take place in a broader system, which is dynamic and complex. It is safe to assume that everything we do influences things beyond the immediate effects of an intervention. And virtually all interventions will have implications for the environment, either positive or negative, intended or unintended. Sometimes we face trade-offs and must make choices between maximizing certain benefits at the cost of others.
In a recent GEF evaluation on multiple benefits, we identified such cases where maximization of both environmental and economic benefits was not possible, or where there were possible conflicts between environmental benefits, e.g., in terms of reforestation and maintaining biological diversity. The evaluation brought these factors out to the open for an informed policy and strategy discussion. It is no longer possible for evaluation to focus narrowly on the internal logic of an individual intervention without paying attention to the broader context in which it is situated.
Top Tip 3. Methods should not drive evaluations. While solid methodologies for data collection and analysis are essential, evaluators should not let methods drive the scope and question setting of evaluations. It must be the other way around: choose the approaches and methods based on what questions you need answers to. In most cases, mixed methods in the context of a solid theory of change is the way to go. Quantification of impacts is an attractive goal, but there are significant limitations to experimental and quasi-experimental tools with regard to their explanatory power and external validity. They seldom allow us to understand why something happened, what motivated people, what were the unintended consequences and so forth. For this, we need subtler, often qualitative tools.
At the GEF, we normally start our evaluations with a literature review, as there often is plenty of scientific evidence around the issues that we are tackling. Such a review allows us to refine our theory of change, avoid false assumptions, and also to save time and effort. An adequate understanding of the natural system, as well as the human system, is needed to be able to identify the environmental impacts of the intervention. An individual evaluator can of course not be an expert in all fields, so it can be very useful to team up with colleagues with diverse backgrounds.
Top Tip 4. Think about our interconnected world, and implore others to do the same. These approaches go beyond how evaluations are often conducted and can be challenging. It is however necessary to broaden our vistas to make a meaningful contribution to solving the challenges for a more sustainable, inclusive and environmentally sound future. As evaluators it is incumbent upon us to also advise the users and commissioners of evaluation that they need to allow evaluation to explore the broader connections of interventions in this complex world.
After all, we all want to make a difference for the better, and done right, evaluation can be a powerful tool to inform policy and decision making for sustainable development in this rapidly changing world.
Sunday, June 10, 2018
Pharoah Sanders @ DC Jazz Festival
The annual DC Jazz Festival had a fabulous
start for me. It came in the shape of Pharoah Sanders and his group that
performed on Saturday, June 9th, at the City Winery. Despite having
been a fan since the 1970s, I had actually never witnessed the legendary
saxophonist perform live. I had invested in a prime seat at a table next to the
stage and ordered a carafe of nice Sauvignon Blanc, so I was ready for the
experience. And it didn’t disappoint me. In the bar waiting for the show to
start I happened to sit next to a young man who drew my attention because he
was reading an actual physical book while sipping a glass of Pinot Noir.
Matthew had recently moved to DC for his first job after college. I was
delighted to find that such a young person was a great fan of Pharoah Sanders.
And not only that: the book he was reading turned out to be the Kenyan author
and academic Ngugi wa Thiong’o’s Devil on
the Cross. My faith in the future of humankind restored, I was in a
suitable mood to receive Pharoah’s delivery of the universal language of music.
The group started with a lengthy
meditative piece, a trademark of the master on which he played soothing long
sounds on his tenor against a background of a bowed bass and drums played on
soft mallets. The pianist ventured into a thoughtful solo while the leader sat
down and listened with his eyes closed. The first piece then turned into a
second, a medium-tempo modal tune with Spanish overtones. It provided a superb
vehicle for all of the musicians’ solos. The piano solo reminded me of McCoy
Tyner or Lonnie Liston Smith, both Sanders collaborators in the past. The
drummer produced a highly musical solo against a steady rhythm provided by the
bassist, his kit placed low with even the cymbals in a horizontal position. His
work was complemented by that of the fierce looking percussionist wearing long-horned
headgear.
Sanders at 77, his long beard now totally
white, initially appeared slightly wobbly, taking short steps and sitting down
frequently, but as the concert progressed he gained strength moving across the
stage in tandem with the rhythms of the music. It was clear that he enjoyed the
performance and listened appreciatively to his younger sidemen. He drew the
audience along into a celebratory mood.
Sanders’ name is inextricably linked to
that of John Coltrane. In 1964 Trane asked him to sit in with his band and, although
Sanders never formally became a member of the group, he was a regular
collaborator until Coltrane’s death in 1967. His own debut album as leader also
came out in 1964. In those times, Sanders played unmitigated aggressive free
jazz and had a raw, abrasive sound, which belied his history as a be-bop and
R&B sax man. After Trane’s death, he collaborated for a while with the
great man’s widow, the pianist and harpist Alice Coltrane. In the 1970s,
Sanders’ style softened and became distinctly more lyrical, gaining influences
from Asian music without losing its edge. This was the side of him we heard at
the City Winery: a tenor sound that was mostly smooth and beautiful only to be
punctuated by abrupt shrieks and honks.
Then another surprise move from the master
as he launched into a rendition of the classic ballad A Nightingale Sang on Berkeley Square. It was a powerful yet
lyrical performance that transfixed the audience. At the end of his solo,
Pharoah even briefly allowed a rare glimpse at his be-bop chops.
The superb concert ended with a joyful
romp in calypso style. It inspired the old master himself to dance to the music
produced by his excellent band. Needless to say, the room exploded in a
standing ovation as the music ended. Unfortunately, we were not treated to an
encore, but we could all go home with a satisfied mind and a smile on our
faces.
Labels:
City Winery,
concert,
DC Jazz Festival,
Jazz,
Music,
performance,
Pharoah Sanders
Friday, January 19, 2018
The Lost City of the Monkey God: A True Story by Douglas Preston
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
The legend of the White City – Ciudad Blanca – has fascinated men for generations and many have gone searching for the lost city in the remote jungles of Moskitia in Honduras. One of these men is Steve Elkins, a self-described “cinematographer, a curious man, an adventurer” (p. 9) whom the author of the present book, Douglas Preston, discovers, befriends and eventually joins in the search. Preston, an accomplished writer and a veteran adventurer himself, with a history with the American Museum of Natural History and the National Geographic Society, becomes equally immersed in the effort to find and understand the disappeared city. The book is partly a real-life adventure story, but partly it gives a rather comprehensive history of the region and the archeological work surrounding it.
Following innovative use of LiDAR technology that identifies potential sites to start the search, an expedition is launched in the most inaccessible and hostile jungle valley to initiate an archeological study of the lost ‘City of the Monkey God.’ The obsessed Elkins is the driving force, but he receives backing from a variety of sources and also convinces the government of Honduras to endorse and support the effort. He puts together a mixed team that includes highly qualified archeological experts (led by Chris Fisher), as well as a film crew, photographers and others, including Preston. There is also a small band of former SAS agents providing security and survival skills to the team. Early on in the effort, a Honduras-based American fixer, Bruce Heinicke, with a dubious past in the drug trade provides his often unscrupulous services.
After a section on the history of the search for the city, the main part of the book focuses on the expedition, as it prepares for the field work and its stay on the site. This turns out to be a harrowing experience in the jungle that is infested with highly poisonous snakes and myriad insects, jaguars and other predators circling the campsite. During heavy rains the site floods and turns into mud. Despite their precautions the expedition members are soon covered in nasty bug bites.
The expedition is basically successful in its quest. However, an academic controversy rises around it when the news of the find come out and are widely advertised by the National Geographic Society. A group of American archeologists spearheaded by Christopher Begley of Transylvania University and Rosemary Joyce of UC Berkeley attack the effort on various grounds of “false claims of discovery” (their assertion is that the discovered city is much less of significance archeologically than Preston, Elkins and the National Geographic suggest) and “antiquated and offensive, ethnocentric attitudes” (in terms of dismissing local peoples’ knowledge of the area) (p. 186). Although the attacks seem exaggerated, at the very minimum – given that the expedition is fully endorsed at the highest level of Honduran authorities and is conducted very professionally under the supervision of well-respected archeologists – the controversy does not go away and the expedition continues to be accused of “B movie fantasy” resurrecting the “trope” of “the big hero explorer” (p. 188). In fact, I recently read a rather vitriolic review of the book (and another one, Jungleland by Christopher S. Stewart) written by Mark Bonta of Penn State for The AAG Review of Books (Fall 2017). In it, Bonta points to “the disconnections and conjunctions of scholars and the popular pseudoscientific imagination” (AAG p. 279).
Preston speculates for the reasons, the simplest of which might be professional jealousy, especially coming from Begley who himself has been compared to “modern day Indiana Jones” and known for traveling to Honduras with his own film crews. Another reason might be that the current Honduran president and administration came to power through a coup and replaced also the national archeological authorities that had supported Begley and the Americans. Be that as it may, many journalists picked up the controversy and had little interest in hearing both sides of the story. In the end, the site is being excavated and preserved with the full support of Honduras, including President Hernández.
Although the adventure at the heart of the book is well told and interesting, to me the most important part of the book is the last third. There has been a lot of speculation why the thriving (and controversial) City of the Monkey God suddenly disappeared five centuries ago with its inhabitants abandoning it over a short period of time. The explanation seems to hinge on brutal epidemics that devastated the old Mesoamerican (and beyond) indigenous cultures as the Spanish conquistadores arrived. The native populations who had no resistance to the Old World diseases succumbed in incredible numbers, so that even 90 percent of the populations died. This was of course an add-on to the “cruelty, slavery, rape, abuse, starvation, war and genocide” inflicted on the people by the Spanish, English and other invaders (p. 295). Preston cites the work of Jared Diamond whose famous book Collapse describes the historical collapse of many civilizations around the world through environmental overstretch, disease, invaders and other factors (I might note that Diamond, too, as a scientist prone to popularizing knowledge and using grand theories to explain change is reviled in some academic circles).
Ironically, about half of the expedition members, including Preston, catch a seemingly incurable tropical disease, leishmaniasis, during their stay in the jungle. Perhaps the scariest conclusion of the book is that these kinds of diseases that today are the daily reality of mostly poor people living in the tropics, are becoming more common also in the developed countries in the North. The main reasons for this are the increased air travel that rapidly transports people between different part of the world and, importantly, climate change that makes previously safe areas in North America, Europe and Asia (including Japan) more susceptible to tropical parasites and their hosts and vectors. This unfortunate fact raises the likelihood of a major global pandemic that could devastate societies and economies. The only positive aspect of this is that, perhaps, more investment will go to research and the development of drugs and vaccines now that people in the wealthy and powerful North are threatened.
On a personal level, the book made me think about my forthcoming trip to the Amazon rainforest next week where there is a current epidemic of yellow fever and dengue, and where the nurse in my office told me to use a double protection of insect repellent against horse flies and other biting insects. Little good did these precautions do to Preston and his mates.
View all my reviews
My rating: 4 of 5 stars
The legend of the White City – Ciudad Blanca – has fascinated men for generations and many have gone searching for the lost city in the remote jungles of Moskitia in Honduras. One of these men is Steve Elkins, a self-described “cinematographer, a curious man, an adventurer” (p. 9) whom the author of the present book, Douglas Preston, discovers, befriends and eventually joins in the search. Preston, an accomplished writer and a veteran adventurer himself, with a history with the American Museum of Natural History and the National Geographic Society, becomes equally immersed in the effort to find and understand the disappeared city. The book is partly a real-life adventure story, but partly it gives a rather comprehensive history of the region and the archeological work surrounding it.
Following innovative use of LiDAR technology that identifies potential sites to start the search, an expedition is launched in the most inaccessible and hostile jungle valley to initiate an archeological study of the lost ‘City of the Monkey God.’ The obsessed Elkins is the driving force, but he receives backing from a variety of sources and also convinces the government of Honduras to endorse and support the effort. He puts together a mixed team that includes highly qualified archeological experts (led by Chris Fisher), as well as a film crew, photographers and others, including Preston. There is also a small band of former SAS agents providing security and survival skills to the team. Early on in the effort, a Honduras-based American fixer, Bruce Heinicke, with a dubious past in the drug trade provides his often unscrupulous services.
After a section on the history of the search for the city, the main part of the book focuses on the expedition, as it prepares for the field work and its stay on the site. This turns out to be a harrowing experience in the jungle that is infested with highly poisonous snakes and myriad insects, jaguars and other predators circling the campsite. During heavy rains the site floods and turns into mud. Despite their precautions the expedition members are soon covered in nasty bug bites.
The expedition is basically successful in its quest. However, an academic controversy rises around it when the news of the find come out and are widely advertised by the National Geographic Society. A group of American archeologists spearheaded by Christopher Begley of Transylvania University and Rosemary Joyce of UC Berkeley attack the effort on various grounds of “false claims of discovery” (their assertion is that the discovered city is much less of significance archeologically than Preston, Elkins and the National Geographic suggest) and “antiquated and offensive, ethnocentric attitudes” (in terms of dismissing local peoples’ knowledge of the area) (p. 186). Although the attacks seem exaggerated, at the very minimum – given that the expedition is fully endorsed at the highest level of Honduran authorities and is conducted very professionally under the supervision of well-respected archeologists – the controversy does not go away and the expedition continues to be accused of “B movie fantasy” resurrecting the “trope” of “the big hero explorer” (p. 188). In fact, I recently read a rather vitriolic review of the book (and another one, Jungleland by Christopher S. Stewart) written by Mark Bonta of Penn State for The AAG Review of Books (Fall 2017). In it, Bonta points to “the disconnections and conjunctions of scholars and the popular pseudoscientific imagination” (AAG p. 279).
Preston speculates for the reasons, the simplest of which might be professional jealousy, especially coming from Begley who himself has been compared to “modern day Indiana Jones” and known for traveling to Honduras with his own film crews. Another reason might be that the current Honduran president and administration came to power through a coup and replaced also the national archeological authorities that had supported Begley and the Americans. Be that as it may, many journalists picked up the controversy and had little interest in hearing both sides of the story. In the end, the site is being excavated and preserved with the full support of Honduras, including President Hernández.
Although the adventure at the heart of the book is well told and interesting, to me the most important part of the book is the last third. There has been a lot of speculation why the thriving (and controversial) City of the Monkey God suddenly disappeared five centuries ago with its inhabitants abandoning it over a short period of time. The explanation seems to hinge on brutal epidemics that devastated the old Mesoamerican (and beyond) indigenous cultures as the Spanish conquistadores arrived. The native populations who had no resistance to the Old World diseases succumbed in incredible numbers, so that even 90 percent of the populations died. This was of course an add-on to the “cruelty, slavery, rape, abuse, starvation, war and genocide” inflicted on the people by the Spanish, English and other invaders (p. 295). Preston cites the work of Jared Diamond whose famous book Collapse describes the historical collapse of many civilizations around the world through environmental overstretch, disease, invaders and other factors (I might note that Diamond, too, as a scientist prone to popularizing knowledge and using grand theories to explain change is reviled in some academic circles).
Ironically, about half of the expedition members, including Preston, catch a seemingly incurable tropical disease, leishmaniasis, during their stay in the jungle. Perhaps the scariest conclusion of the book is that these kinds of diseases that today are the daily reality of mostly poor people living in the tropics, are becoming more common also in the developed countries in the North. The main reasons for this are the increased air travel that rapidly transports people between different part of the world and, importantly, climate change that makes previously safe areas in North America, Europe and Asia (including Japan) more susceptible to tropical parasites and their hosts and vectors. This unfortunate fact raises the likelihood of a major global pandemic that could devastate societies and economies. The only positive aspect of this is that, perhaps, more investment will go to research and the development of drugs and vaccines now that people in the wealthy and powerful North are threatened.
On a personal level, the book made me think about my forthcoming trip to the Amazon rainforest next week where there is a current epidemic of yellow fever and dengue, and where the nurse in my office told me to use a double protection of insect repellent against horse flies and other biting insects. Little good did these precautions do to Preston and his mates.
View all my reviews
Tuesday, January 9, 2018
The GEF in the Changing Landscape of Environmental Finance
[Published in Earth-Eval]
We have recently completed the Sixth Comprehensive Evaluation of the GEF (known by its acronym OPS6). The Comprehensive Evaluations are conducted by the Independent Evaluation Office every four years as critical inputs to the GEF replenishment process. I presented the final draft of the OPS6 to the second replenishment meeting in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in October 2017 and the GEF Council in November. The donors to the GEF recognized the evaluation as a foundation for determining the programmatic directions for the next, seventh, GEF replenishment period. OPS6 was a major collective effort, which kept us at the IEO occupied for the better part of two years. It brought together 29 separate evaluations and studies that focused on a wide set of issues, ranging from the results and impacts of the GEF and its various focal areas and programs, to organizational and institutional issues. In conducting the evaluation, we utilized mixed methods, both quantitative and qualitative, to ensure the best approach to answer the evaluation questions posed. Many of the approaches were innovative, such as the use of geospatial tools and methods to track impact and value for money of GEF funded programs and projects on the ground. We also applied formative approaches to evaluate progress made in the Integrated Approach Pilots that were launched during the current GEF cycle. While each of the component evaluations has its own detailed conclusions and recommendations, the Comprehensive Evaluation brings them together at a high strategic level.
Judging from the terminal evaluations of completed projects, the GEF continues to perform well at the aggregate level. Some 81% of the completed projects were judged to have satisfactory or higher outcome ratings. The GEF has also exceeded its co-financing targets raising $8.8 to each dollar invested by the GEF. More challenging is ensuring the continuation of the global environmental benefits after the projects are closed. Only 62% of the projects were judged to have outcomes that are likely to be sustained. The reasons behind this drop often appear to lie in institutional capacity and financial sustainability in the program countries. Indeed, proof of this seems to be that middle-income countries tend to perform better on sustainability than do least developed countries. Furthermore, projects in biodiversity and land degradation face bigger sustainability challenges than those in climate change, likely because of the limited alternative sources of funding and the lack of private sector involvement. These are crucial issues that we need to understand better and, consequently, the IEO has embarked on an exercise to unpack the mechanisms behind sustainability. We expect to present this study to the Council in its next meeting in June 2018, so stay tuned.
Another important development in GEF programming in the past years has been the increase in programmatic approaches, as well as the rise of multifocal area projects that address simultaneously biodiversity conservation, sustainable forest management, land degradation, and climate change and carbon sequestration. Two major evaluations focused on these, finding that projects under programs do indeed tend to perform slightly better than standalone projects, although increased complexity when programs involve multiple countries or agencies and cut across focal areas poses some challenges that need to be managed. The multifocal area projects do produce benefits on multiple fronts when trade-offs, especially between environmental and socioeconomic outcomes, are well managed. (For the findings of the formative evaluation of the Integrated Approach Pilots, see earlier blogs by Dennis Bours.)
The Comprehensive Evaluation concluded that the GEF’s main comparative advantage in the rapidly changing and expanding global environmental finance landscape lies in its ability to address a broad range of environmental issues and the synergies between them, not just climate change, and to serve multiple Conventions and multilateral environmental agreements. It is virtually the only public funding source for the biodiversity, land degradation, and chemicals conventions, and provides important support to many regional and global agreements around international waters. In the increasingly crowded field of climate finance, the GEF still plays a central role but must define its niche more clearly. The GEF also has proven strengths in working with governments to create an enabling environment in countries through legal and regulatory reforms that lay the ground for lasting improvements in environmental management. A study we conducted identified conditions, which are necessary for programming to lead to transformational change. These include a level of ambition and setting in place mechanism for sustainability from the outset.
The recommendations of OPS6 build upon the conclusions regarding the GEF’s comparative advantages regarding its strategic positioning in the broad global environmental field and the strengths of its work on transformational change. The evaluation recognizes the value of integration in programming that addresses multiple environmental issues, but also calls for caution in managing complexity. Integration should be based on the need when the environmental problems call for integrated solutions, and on GEF’s additionality. Not everything is entirely rosy either. Despite its solid performance over a quarter century, the GEF still has areas where more progress needs to be made. Its track record on engaging with the private sector is still rather patchy. Progress has been made in integrating the gender dimension and in engaging with indigenous peoples in GEF programming, but more remains to be done to ensure that the organization applies internationally recognized good practice standards.
The third replenishment meeting of the GEF will take place at the end of January in Brazil. As instructed by the GEF Council, the GEF Secretariat has taken the OPS6 recommendations and fed them into their plans for the programming directions and policy agenda for the next GEF cycle. As an evaluator, I am naturally very pleased as I see that our hard work is having a concrete real-time impact on how we approach global environmental challenges that are fundamental to the survival of humankind.
Labels:
biodiversity,
Climate Change,
Environment,
evaluation,
GEF,
land degradation,
water
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)